Paul's Perambulations a personal blog

February 1, 2008

All people deserve an opportunity for a healthy and productive life.

Filed under: Love,Politics,Religion — admin @ 4:07 pm

1. There is an undeniable value to every human life.

All war is a crime against human life.  “Human” life is defined by its distinctly human quality, and thus euthanasia and abortion are not acceptable if they destroy that human quality of life.

 2.  Every human life must be given adequate opportunity to develop.

Is it right that humans enter life with vastly different opportunities before them? Some are born rich, some poor. All humans have a right to personal property, a private life, safety, education, and health care. Once these needs have been met for all, those who have earned additional goods justly can be deserving of them. Humans are not equal but vary greatly in traits and talents; all must be given sufficient opportunity to develop their unique talents.  It is natural that results will vary greatly, with some being more successful than others. There continues to be a basic value and protection of every human life, including those lives which are less successful. Inherited wealth, passed from those who are dead to the living who have not earned it, is a crime against the values of a just society. Property that is strictly personal property can be inherited.

3. The natural world is a gift to all humanity and thus individual humans cannot “own” it, to do with as they wish.

Humans cannot own or inherit the natural world. It is a gift we neither earned nor did anything to deserve. Individual humans cannot control the use of the water or the air or the land. Accumulations of land, minerals, forests, water and their immediate derivatives, beyond what is sufficient for one’s personal needs, is a crime against humanity and nature. All living things must be given their due respect.

These three basic values are a vision for the future and not a political or sociological blueprint for how they might occur. Human values require that we look ahead not in terms of years or decades or even lifetimes, but for centuries.

 

March 5, 2007

Unconditional Love

Filed under: Love,Peace,Religion — admin @ 10:47 pm

There are two things of which I am certain. That I love my wife Fran. That I cannot particpate in war. I experience them as complementary.  The tangible love that I feel for my wife enhances the more conceptual abhorrence of war.  Love for my wife helps me directly comprehend that war, in destroying such life and love, is totally unjust. I describe my love as unconditional love. I find this to be an amazing and life-changing conviction. It does not mean that I never get angry.  Fran and I are blessed to be amazingly well matched, but we are not perfect.  But in this instance I believe that perfect love, in the sense of being forgiving, understanding, and having total confidence in one’s love, is achievable. Such love blesses both the giver and the receiver. It is a feeling that is so rare and special, that for me it is experienced as a gift from God. This experience becomes part of the tangible evidence for the love that God has for all human kind, and has the effect that I become a channel for expressing this love to the world through my resistance to war.  War destroys love; war is a denial of God.

December 20, 2006

What is the meaning of marriage?

Filed under: Love — admin @ 10:10 pm

Here is my letter published in the August 2005 issue of Friends Journal:

I found your recent material on marriage to be particuarly relevant for me.  I am getting married this fall under the care of Lansdowne (PA) Meeting, and this has sent me on a journey to consider the spiritual meaning of marriage and its relationship (if any) to the state’s concept of marriage (defined strictly as a legal contract).  I had intended to be married under the care of the meeting but to not apply for a license, and then ask to have the marriage recognized by Pennsylvania. But Pennsylvania abolished common law marriage as of January 1, 2005.  So I will be getting a license to get married, just like folks have to get a dog license or a driver’s license.  But at least for a driver’s license, the state requires some exhibition of capability with respect to what it is allowing.  How can the state “allow” marriage at all?  Governmental history in this regard is abysmal — less than half a century ago, interracial marriage was still illegal in Virginia (until this was oveturned by the U.S. Supreme Court).  In the first half of the 20th century, many states (not just in the south) had miscegenation laws regarding marriage.

Musical interlude: Too late for our October 8 Quaker wedding

Filed under: Love — admin @ 9:22 pm

Our Quaker Meeting for Marriage was unusual in a number of ways, even for a Quaker marriage (ask me about it).  One idea came too late for incorporation into the Meeting ceremony.  At the start of Meeting (there was no wedding march) I spoke about how I first met Fran on the proverbial “dark and stormy night” in the woods, and how that set in motion the most significant change in my life.   After a pause for reflection, Chopin’s Revolution Etude bursts forth from our Meeting’s fine old grand piano. If you’re familiar with the piece (very difficult to play), you can image jaws dropping.  But, musically, it perfectly reflects our first meeting.  Well, I wasn’t able to set it up in time with Curtis, but I still smile to think of it.  You don’t hear THAT very often at a wedding.  But there’s still a chance, at the 10th anniversary repetition of our vows. If you want to hear what I’m talking about… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Frederic_Chopin_-_Opus_10_-_Twelve_Grand_Etudes_-_c_minor.ogg

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress